2021年6月英语六级听力真题(第1套) 短文(1)
日期:2021-07-09 16:17

(单词翻译:单击)

,qMDN];vF(iQHb8I=fG4&v_FidiU)i=x

Passage One

[L_r16A~6^

短文1

&+!@9o^=TYB_

Scientists often use specialized jargon terms while communicating with laymen.

TN!_Je|z~)~!-hH14~&

科学家在与非专业人员交流时经常使用专业术语xtYJZ=j=@VXuzk3XiB.

IP6*A2HeDA7c4(6M333#

Most of them don't realize the harmful effects of this practice.

@K^18^4(S1xn7kY8!+L

他们中的大多数人没有意识到这种做法的危害SQ@QQb5KrXCY7hn

.Yl(#([^[UWT

In a new study, people exposed to jargon when reading about subjects like autonomous vehicles and surgical robots

ITsuWg4XNr#(

在一项新的研究中,阅读如自动驾驶汽车和手术机器人等主题时接触到专业术语人们

]Q.C(,ga&1

later said they were less interested in science than others who read about the same topics, but without the use of specialized terms.

X^)yHIS7h1A-hDS^^BT[

后来说,他们对科学的兴趣不如那些阅读不含专业术语的相同主题的人高cG!-iEpSZrv,@vEB2n8

p)&d(4oV4nz(c

They also felt less informed about science and less qualified to discuss science topics.

wUGD_G+*YxFJi;i0rI.

他们还觉得自己对科学了解较少,没有资格讨论科学话题ybiZ(VD=_!~5oI.G4

W*g1Jkn,0z&

It's noteworthy that it made no difference if the jargon terms were defined in the text.

as.4)+]NqwcJuvT

值得注意的是,文本中是否对专业术语进行定义解释,并没有什么区别e@QK~z|l];I,Q

+S)PG6P6q+5zt]=Ej

Even when the terms were defined, readers still felt the same lack of engagement as readers who read jargon that wasn't explained.

H0*yXe^)Xflx]e6~%L&A

即使对这些术语进行定义解释,读者仍然会感到缺乏参与感,就像那些阅读没有解释的术语的读者一样a)X.Kh-D,VImkH#n*,7E

ctWLXNGh*BY|odTC.

The problem is that the mere presence of jargon sends a discouraging message to readers.

gf^N71S&%kTk_^OO

问题在于,仅仅是术语的出现就会给读者传递一种令人沮丧的信息&+F9%DR#0O+,s_JJ

rh-I5vn2UBUcAk

Hillary Schulman, the author of the study, asserts that specialized words are a signal.

P6|V6PI))ha@4

这项研究的作者希拉里·舒尔曼声称,专业词汇是一种信号3HIK%@9O7=Mczb.tR8e

wA8OvQS!+UBvvN^P|B

Jargon tells people that the message isn't for them.

+c~IVPy+~g|GMxNg@

专业术语告诉人们,这条信息不适合他们Z;kt]jV%@lR

)JeJ2J-PuKM^

There's an even darker side to how people react to jargon.

F,24URBNxSK-

人们对术语的反应还有更不好的一面@gvN.Eh6A%h)|hjNoxY

;IB~@rq|]rF&

In another study, researchers found that reading scientific articles containing jargon led people to doubt the actual science.

[wIWR4VS8vpJ,XhIRCGf

在另一项研究中,研究人员发现,阅读含有术语的科学文章会让人怀疑真正的科学v.xmi082uZ

m,lM-d-z.[pvz34DXWL9

They found the opposite, when a text is easier to read.

a8ZsQx^cNZ

他们发现,当文本更容易阅读时,情况恰恰相反d=i!=W,1c@i3YzmsYT8

L23Fe|-d*kJnmN

Then, people are more persuaded.

1pr9qCg7^&DQ.7vyRx

这样,人们更容易被说服67fsppzqUec(avP68O

cLx8ZkspHP_oPh

Thus, it's important to communicate clearly when talking about complex science subjects.

YI0-O-~9K~e|e&uP.

因此,在谈论复杂的科学问题时,清晰地沟通是很重要的kxpncZJEEj

38Vnz2^6-0Ub~yU)tp#a

This is especially true with issues related to public health, like the safety of new medications and the benefits of vaccines.

u[Mr6zVUyRXFt2

在公共卫生问题上尤其如此,比如新药的安全性和疫苗的好处moSCR,!7oClBqw&=

v&1p|VAXabMDAwN(!DB9

Schulman concedes that the use of jargon is appropriate with scientific audiences.

[%jpC;%^,~g^!F@C

舒尔曼承认,面对科学学者使用术语是合适的-KIe;*C0M2O7kgt

FN987JEUyle)uX~e|6Q-

But scientists who want to communicate with the general public need to modify their language.

C+QTYxfH[c3DkaK%Oki

但是,想要与公众交流的科学家需要调整他们的语言)^f*Nmb7INw-Aswu

y8jb(y9+54#H|zgV*vi

They need to eliminate jargon.

Hkg@u~M.2%)A_0M~H

他们需要停止使用专业术语-J)!2.u4NBn%^&TQ3Gko

UMYD0U_pv~VODj(U2

Questions nine to eleven are based on the passage you have just heard.

BOjCy9_rhF9Y

问题9-11基于你刚才听到的短文q*mX!W6d8,8R()T*k

@r-lAPe~2-BP

Q9: What does the passage say about the use of jargon terms by experts?

UD9WXJq|3Z6=8m

问题9:关于专家们对专业术语的使用,这篇文章说了什么?

f2R;sLj@gyJht1

Q10: What do researchers find about people reading scientific articles containing jargon terms?

@Vq[y5AY2DE7yLs)~uG

问题10:研究人员在阅读含专业术语的科学文章的人们身上发现了什么?

W9,Fpx5H!6uJ!VAfZ]

Q11: What does Schulman suggest scientists do when communicating with the general public?

~uy*#.fT~JgFmoD@O]*b

问题11:舒尔曼建议科学家在和公众交流时应该怎么做?

BW.lH&-e(Azc0Z.vC_GhUhS);J#Y+iLXi!Z^uxVr;F6]X
分享到